From MacOSX-TeX@email.esm.psu.edu Thu Aug 11 20:10:15 2005
Return-path:
Received: from mac.com (smtpin03-en2 [10.13.10.148])
by ms83.mac.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.06 (built Mar 28 2005))
with ESMTP id <0IL3007LL1T3GD@ms83.mac.com>; Thu,
11 Aug 2005 17:10:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout06-en1.mac.com [17.250.248.97])
by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin03/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id j7C0ACKP021201; Thu,
11 Aug 2005 17:10:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brightmail15-bge1 (brightmail15-bge1 [10.13.10.131])
by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout06/MantshX 4.0)
with ESMTP id j7C0A6Zx018285; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 17:10:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.203.201.22] by brightmail15 (bmifilter); Thu,
11 Aug 2005 17:00:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from engremail2.engr.psu.edu ([130.203.201.116])
by ENGRMAIL2.engr.psu.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu,
11 Aug 2005 20:00:32 -0400
Received: from email.esm.psu.edu ([130.203.247.204]) by engremail2.engr.psu.edu
with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 11 Aug 2005 20:00:00 -0400
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 20:00:13 -0400
From: TeX on Mac OS X Mailing List
Subject: MacOSX-TeX Digest #1461 - 08/11/05
Sender: MacOSX-TeX@email.esm.psu.edu
To: TeX on Mac OS X Mailing List
Message-id: <35213.91720@email.esm.psu.edu>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: List
X-BLTSYMAVREINSERT: oeTy6CT7UkJ6+d13FVPuswLhxKYA
X-LR-SENT-TO: mail.engr.psu.edu
List-Subscribe:
List-Digest:
List-Unsubscribe:
List-Software: LetterRip Pro 4.05 (0531) by LetterRip Software, LLC.
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Aug 2005 00:00:00.0938 (UTC)
FILETIME=[C8CFE0A0:01C59ED0]
MacOSX-TeX Digest #1461 - Thursday, August 11, 2005
Re: [OS X TeX] $MANPATH (again??)
by "Steffen Hokland"
Re: [OS X TeX] PDF resolution redux
by "Bernhard Barkow"
Re: [OS X TeX] $MANPATH (again??)
by "Martin Buchmann"
Re: [OS X TeX] Getting TeXshop to show full pathname in title bar?
by "Jan Hegewald"
Re: [OS X TeX] Getting TeXshop to show full pathname in title bar?
by "Peter Dyballa"
Re: [OS X TeX] $MANPATH (again??)
by "Gerben Wierda"
Re: [OS X TeX] $MANPATH (again??)
by "Gerben Wierda"
Re: [OS X TeX] $MANPATH (again??)
by "Steffen Hokland"
Re: [OS X TeX] $MANPATH (again??)
by "mark oilcan"
Re: [OS X TeX] $MANPATH (again??)
by "Gerben Wierda"
Re: [OS X TeX] $MANPATH (again??)
by "Gerben Wierda"
Re: [OS X TeX] $MANPATH (again??)
by "Herbert Schulz"
TeXshop and Springer manuscript submissions
by "Jeff Roland"
Re: [OS X TeX] $MANPATH (again??)
by "Bruno Voisin"
Re: [OS X TeX] PDF resolution redux
by "Armin Goralczyk"
Re: [OS X TeX] TeXshop and Springer manuscript submissions
by "Peter Pagin"
Re: [OS X TeX] Fourier as TrueType?
by "Michel Bovani"
Re: [OS X TeX] PDF resolution redux
by "Morten H=F8gholm"
Re: [OS X TeX] Fourier as TrueType?
by "Bruno Voisin"
Re: [OS X TeX] TeXshop and Springer manuscript submissions
by "Jeff Roland"
Re: [OS X TeX] TeXshop and Springer manuscript submissions
by "Chris Goedde"
Re: [OS X TeX] TeXshop and Springer manuscript submissions
by "Jeff Roland"
Version control of documents in TeXShop
by "Andrew Kurtz"
Re: [OS X TeX] Version control of documents in TeXShop
by "Stephan Hochhaus"
Re: [OS X TeX] Version control of documents in TeXShop
by "Bruno Voisin"
Re: [OS X TeX] Version control of documents in TeXShop
by "Peter Dyballa"
Re: [OS X TeX] Version control of documents in TeXShop
by "Bruno Voisin"
Re: [OS X TeX] $MANPATH (again??)
by "Aaron Jackson"
Re: [OS X TeX] Version control of documents in TeXShop
by "Alain Schremmer"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] $MANPATH (again??)
From: "Steffen Hokland"
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:16:48 +0200
Thanks to Bruno and Anthony for their comprehensive suggestions. I'm
giving ManOpen a try.
Incidently - am I doing something very wrong with adding the line:
alias man=3D"man -M /usr/local/man/:${MANPATH}"
to my ~/.profile? It works, but I don't know if there is some subtle
hitch to it....
Thanks for the help,
Steffen
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] PDF resolution redux
From: "Bernhard Barkow"
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:24:58 +0200
On 10.08.2005, at 20:59, Armin Goralczyk wrote:
>>> Thanks. I just realized that my question wasn't put well. What I
>>> want is to tell Pdf(la)tex to scale down the document. Of course,
>>> I could downsample the individual images, but I'm looking for a
>>> solution which would allow to keep one version of the original
>>> images and have different pdfs created depending on the
>>> resolution I need on a specific occasion. Let's say a low
>>> resolution to put the document on the web and a high resolution
>>> for printing. So I don't want to manipulate the images but have
>>> pdftex downsample them.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Look up \pdfimageresolution in the pdftex manual.
>>
>
> I tried to use '\pdfimageresolution 30' in the preamble but size of
> document did not change. Do I have to apply it to every image? Also
> from pdftex manual:
>
> \pdfimageresolution (integer)
> The integer \pdfimageresolution parameter (unit: dots per inch,
> dpi) is a last resort value, used only for bitmap (jpeg,
> png) images, but not for pdfs. The priorities are as follows: Often
> one image dimension (width or height) is stated
> explicitely in the TEX file. Then the image is properly scaled so
> that the aspect ratio is kept. If both image dimensions are
> given, the image will be stretched accordingly, whereby the aspect
> ratio might get distorted. Only if no image dimension
> is given in the TEX file, the image size will be calculated from
> its width and height in pixels, using the x and y resolution
> values normally contained in the image file. If one of these
> resolution values is missing or weird (either < 0 or > 65535),
> the \pdfimageresolution value will be used for both x and y
> resolution, when calculating the image size. And if the
> \pdfimageresolution is zero, finally a default resolution of 72 dpi
> would be taken. The \pdfimageresolution is
> read when pdfTEX creates an image via \pdfximage. The given value
> is clipped to the range 0..65535 [dpi].
>
> Doesn't this imply use of \pdfimageresolution just in the case if a
> value for either width or height is missing? I am a novice so I may
> be wrong, but for me it is not working. What is wrong? Thanks for
> help.
Did you try
\pdfimageresolution=3D300
for 300dpi images (that's what the man page states)?
However, the documentation sounds as if there would be no resampling
at all, but the resolution parameter is only used to calculate the
image size when there is no resolution specified in the image file
(i.e., the number of pixels won't be reduced, but distributed over an
appropriate area, to put it simple...).
Thus it seems to me that the only way to accomplish the original task
(ensuring that images in the finished pdf document are not beyond a
maximum resolution (dpi)) is to use either Acrobat or a Quartz
filter on the whole pdf document, as described in earlier postings.
BB
____________________________________________________
_________________________________ Bernhard Barkow __
__ __
__ mail bb@creativeeyes.at __ www.creativeeyes.at __
__ Phone +43 699 12660415 __ Fax +43 1 8775334 __
___________________ gpg key ID _ A89F09C45921020D __
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] $MANPATH (again??)
From: "Martin Buchmann"
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:29:39 +0200
Steffen,
IIRC you should use the manpath program and its config file to specify
the manpath nowadays. Try 'man manpath' for more information.
I would prefer
export MANPATH=3D/usr/local/man/:$MANPATH
in my .profile instead of your alias but i guess its obsolet.
Best regards
Martin
--
Real programmers don't write in FORTRAN. FORTRAN is for pipe stress
freaks and crystallography weenies. FORTRAN is for wimp engineers who
wear white socks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] Getting TeXshop to show full pathname in title bar?
From: "Jan Hegewald"
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:23:32 +0200
Am 10.08.2005 um 23:52 schrieb Timothy Van Zandt:
>
>
> Jan Hegewald wrote:
>
>
>> Am 10.08.2005 um 00:40 schrieb Timothy Van Zandt:
>>
>>
>>> Jan Hegewald wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
>>> Since this problem had a OS-X generic solution, let me pose
>>> another editing question that is not really about TeXshop but
>>> rather OS X. When I am searching through a document using the
>>> find panel: because that panel is active, the window of the
>>> document through which I am searching is not active and the
>>> highlight color of text that is found is a dull gray, which
>>> often I have trouble seeing. I don't see any way to change this
>>> color or this behavior. Is there a way?
>>>
>>>
>> I seldom do a search with the find panel open. Usually I enter
>> the search text with cmd-e or I close the find panel after
>> entering the search text. Now one can use cmd-g and or cmd-shift-
>> g to search forwards and backwards. This way there is no
>> disturbing panel around. These are standard keyboard shortcuts
>> and should work in every editor.
>> HTH,
>>
>>
>
> Often I'm trying selectively replace something, so this would only
> work if there were a keyboard shortcut for "replace". That would be
> great, not just for the visual problem I posed. I haven't seen such
> a shortcut nor do I see how to program such thing. Anyone else?
>
You can copy the replace text to the clipboard and paste it over the
selected text you find with cmd-g. This is what I usually do if I do
not want to replace all.
HTH,
--Jan--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] Getting TeXshop to show full pathname in title bar?
From: "Peter Dyballa"
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 11:46:54 +0200
Am 10.08.2005 um 23:52 schrieb Timothy Van Zandt:
> Often I'm trying selectively replace something, so this would only=20
> work if there were a keyboard shortcut for "replace". That would be=20
> great, not just for the visual problem I posed. I haven't seen such a=20=
> shortcut nor do I see how to program such thing. Anyone else?
>
I think Jan's way of doing it with Cmd-g Cmd-v is a good way -- and=20
it's mine too!
--
Greetings
Pete
=93One cannot live by television, video games, top ten CDs, and dumb=20
movies alone=94
(Amiri Baraka 1999)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] $MANPATH (again??)
From: "Gerben Wierda"
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:19:20 +0200
On 10 Aug 2005, at 13:49, Steffen Hokland wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I've looked through the archives of the list but couldn't find an
> answer for this....
>
> I needed to convert a PNG file and wanted to use the convert
> command line tool boundled with ImageMagick (GW-install - of
> course...), however
> # man convert
> returned
> # No manual entry for convert
>
> My MANPATH is: /sw/share/man:/usr/share/man:/usr/local/teTeX/man:/
> usr/X11R6/man:/sw/lib/perl5/5.8.6/man
> which doens't contain /usr/local/man (I've done the quick'n dirty
> fix man -M /usr/local/man convert).
>
> Have I messed up during my install of TeX (CLI use has been
> selected), or should I try to manipulate the MANPATH variable
> in .profile (which I'd rather not...)?
Maybe you upgraded OS X from 10.3 to 10.4? The location of the
manpath setting has changed. Re-run the configure stage of the i-
Package (if that is what you are using) and select enable CLI (and
nothing else because you do not need it).
G
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] $MANPATH (again??)
From: "Gerben Wierda"
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:20:19 +0200
On 10 Aug 2005, at 19:47, Anthony Morton wrote:
>> In case your OS X is Tiger, the MANPATH is set in a different way,
>> in the file /usr/share/misc/man.conf, which associates a man file
>> directory with a binary file directory. In your case,
>> MANPATH_MAP /usr/local/bin /usr/local/share/man
>> The problem is that i-Installer installs man files inside /usr/
>> local/man, not /usr/local/share/man (apart from TeX itself).
Ah, I see. That is one for my todo list
G
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] $MANPATH (again??)
From: "Steffen Hokland"
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:48:03 +0200
>>> In case your OS X is Tiger, the MANPATH is set in a different
>>> way, in the file /usr/share/misc/man.conf, which associates a man
>>> file directory with a binary file directory. In your case,
>>> MANPATH_MAP /usr/local/bin /usr/local/share/man
>>> The problem is that i-Installer installs man files inside /usr/
>>> local/man, not /usr/local/share/man (apart from TeX itself).
>>>
>
> Ah, I see. That is one for my todo list
Well - considering the bulk of work that you've done I guess it isn't
a big one... You could probably place it below 'real work',
'studying' and 'making more kids'...
Thanks for all the good work,
Steffen
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] $MANPATH (again??)
From: "mark oilcan"
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 07:53:24 -0700 (PDT)
--- Steffen Hokland wrote:
>=20
> Incidently - am I doing something very wrong with adding the line:
>=20
> alias man=3D"man -M /usr/local/man/:${MANPATH}"
>=20
> to my ~/.profile? It works, but I don't know if there is some subtle=20
>=20
> hitch to it....
>=20
This will work fine, as long as you have MANPATH set to the necessary
default man directories. For someone who doesn't have MANPATH set this
way (where man just uses the values in /etc/manpath.config) then
executing 'man' will only search /usr/local/man with the above alias.
Mark A
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around=20
http://mail.yahoo.com=20
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] $MANPATH (again??)
From: "Gerben Wierda"
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 17:02:15 +0200
On 11 Aug 2005, at 14:48, Steffen Hokland wrote:
>>>> In case your OS X is Tiger, the MANPATH is set in a different
>>>> way, in the file /usr/share/misc/man.conf, which associates a
>>>> man file directory with a binary file directory. In your case,
>>>> MANPATH_MAP /usr/local/bin /usr/local/share/man
>>>> The problem is that i-Installer installs man files inside /usr/
>>>> local/man, not /usr/local/share/man (apart from TeX itself).
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> Ah, I see. That is one for my todo list
>>
> Well - considering the bulk of work that you've done I guess it
> isn't a big one... You could probably place it below 'real work',
OK.
> 'studying' and 'making more kids'...
I'm done with these ;-)
G
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] $MANPATH (again??)
From: "Gerben Wierda"
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 17:16:59 +0200
My manpath config file contains
MANPATH /usr/local/share/man
MANPATH /usr/local/man
as well as
MANPATH_MAP /usr/local/bin /usr/local/share/man
and as a result finds all man pages both in /usr/local/man and /usr/=20
local/share/man
Did I change my manpath config a while back of is this standard. =20
Because if it is, the symlink is not needed.
Greetings from Cura=E7ao,
G
On 11 Aug 2005, at 14:20, Gerben Wierda wrote:
> On 10 Aug 2005, at 19:47, Anthony Morton wrote:
>
>
>>> In case your OS X is Tiger, the MANPATH is set in a different =20
>>> way, in the file /usr/share/misc/man.conf, which associates a man =20=
>>> file directory with a binary file directory. In your case,
>>> MANPATH_MAP /usr/local/bin /usr/local/share/man
>>> The problem is that i-Installer installs man files inside /usr/=20
>>> local/man, not /usr/local/share/man (apart from TeX itself).
>>>
>
> Ah, I see. That is one for my todo list
>
> G
>
> --------------------- Info ---------------------
> Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
> & FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
> TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
> List Post:
>
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] $MANPATH (again??)
From: "Herbert Schulz"
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:39:00 -0500
On Aug 11, 2005, at 10:16 AM, Gerben Wierda wrote:
> My manpath config file contains
>
> MANPATH /usr/local/share/man
> MANPATH /usr/local/man
>
> as well as
>
> MANPATH_MAP /usr/local/bin /usr/local/share/man
>
> and as a result finds all man pages both in /usr/local/man and /usr/=20=
> local/share/man
>
> Did I change my manpath config a while back of is this standard. =20
> Because if it is, the symlink is not needed.
>
> Greetings from Cura=E7ao,
>
> G
>
>
Howdy,
My man.conf file also contains that (+others, e.g. X11) and, =20
interestingly,
## TeX modifications start at Sat Jun 11 08:47:57 CDT 2005
## Do not remove previous line
MANPATH_MAP /usr/local/teTeX/bin/powerpc-apple-darwin-current /=20
usr/local/teTeX/man
## Do not remove next line
## teTeX modifications end at Sat Jun 11 08:47:57 CDT 2005
##
is at the bottom of the file. I know I didn't change that so did the =20
TeX i-install put it there when I re-installed TeX after doing an =20
Archive & Install of Tiger(r).
Notice that I've reduced the number of redundant r's at the end of =20
Tiger; I used to call it Tigerrrr. It is working much better for me =20
now that I really cleaned up after my old Virex. I've noticed two =20
occasional glitches: once in a while system usage go to 70-90% for a =20
period and everything else is locked up and a similar thing happens =20
with the mds process (which is `niced' but, as has been noted here, =20
that doesn't mean to much). I have no man page for mds although =20
mdimport, etc., do ahve man pages. Does anyone know what mds does? =20
I'd almost guess it is the server for a Spotlight search but...
Good Luck,
Herb Schulz
(herbs@wideopenwest.com)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: TeXshop and Springer manuscript submissions
From: "Jeff Roland"
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 11:40:47 -0500
I'm having trouble uploading a manuscript to Springer's online
submission system as a LaTeX file. I use TeXshop, with BibTeX for
references. Have any of you successfully submitted a LaTeX file to
Springer's system? Any and all help would be appreciated.
TIA,
Jeff
--
Jeffrey Roland
Assistant Professor
Department of Philosophy
106 Coates Hall
Louisiana State University
Baton Rouge LA 70803 USA
Email: jroland@lsu.edu
Phone: (225) 578-7023
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] $MANPATH (again??)
From: "Bruno Voisin"
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:14:38 +0200
Le 11 ao=FBt 05 =E0 17:16, Gerben Wierda a =E9crit :
> My manpath config file contains
>
> MANPATH /usr/local/share/man
> MANPATH /usr/local/man
>
> as well as
>
> MANPATH_MAP /usr/local/bin /usr/local/share/man
>
> and as a result finds all man pages both in /usr/local/man and /usr/=20=
> local/share/man
>
> Did I change my manpath config a while back of is this standard. =20
> Because if it is, the symlink is not needed.
I must admit I don't fully understand how things work (in Tiger). I =20
didn't customize anything (only Tiger + i-Packages). I don't have any =20=
MANPATH set ("echo $MANPATH" in Terminal returns a blank line). PATH =20
is the default, modified by the GS and TeX i-Packages:
legimc11:~ brunovoisin$ echo $PATH
/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/teTeX/=20
bin/powerpc-apple-darwin-current
In /usr/share.misc.conf, there is:
MANPATH /usr/share/man
MANPATH /usr/local/share/man
MANPATH /usr/X11R6/man
then later:
MANPATH_MAP /bin /usr/share/man
MANPATH_MAP /sbin /usr/share/man
MANPATH_MAP /usr/bin /usr/share/man
MANPATH_MAP /usr/sbin /usr/share/man
MANPATH_MAP /usr/local/bin /usr/local/share/man
MANPATH_MAP /usr/local/sbin /usr/local/share/man
MANPATH_MAP /usr/X11R6/bin /usr/X11R6/man
MANPATH_MAP /usr/bin/X11 /usr/X11R6/man
MANPATH_MAP /usr/bin/mh /usr/share/man
and finally, as added when installing the TeX i-Package:
MANPATH_MAP /usr/local/teTeX/bin/powerpc-apple-darwin-current /=20
usr/local/teTeX/man
But now, in Terminal, here's what I get:
legimc11:~ brunovoisin$ manpath
/usr/share/man:/usr/local/teTeX/man:/usr/X11R6/man
Namely /usr/local/share/man, which according to man.conf should be =20
there, is missing. Is this because this directory doesn't exist =20
(there /usr/local/share/, but no man/ inside)?
If man.conf is edited manually, by adding the line:
MANPATH /usr/local/man
then the path is indeed modified:
legimc11:~ brunovoisin$ manpath
/usr/share/man:/usr/local/teTeX/man:/usr/X11R6/man:/usr/local/man
and "man convert" works as expected.
But I would have believed the modification wasn't necessary: if we =20
are to believe what the comments in man.conf say:
# If people ask for "man foo" and have "/dir/bin/foo" in their PATH
# and the docs are found in "/dir/man", then no mapping is =20
required.
then, provided a binary program is in /usr/local/bin/, a man page =20
inside /usr/local/man/ should be found automatically (I verified the =20
NOAUTOPATH flag is indeed commented out in man.conf). Which should =20
apply, in particular, to "convert".
Is there something broken, or did I just misunderstood?
Bruno Voisin=
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] PDF resolution redux
From: "Armin Goralczyk"
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:41:07 +0200
Am 11.08.2005 um 09:24 schrieb Bernhard Barkow:
> On 10.08.2005, at 20:59, Armin Goralczyk wrote:
>
>>>> Thanks. I just realized that my question wasn't put well. What I =20=
>>>> want is to tell Pdf(la)tex to scale down the document. Of =20
>>>> course, I could downsample the individual images, but I'm =20
>>>> looking for a solution which would allow to keep one version of =20
>>>> the original images and have different pdfs created depending on =20=
>>>> the resolution I need on a specific occasion. Let's say a low =20
>>>> resolution to put the document on the web and a high resolution =20
>>>> for printing. So I don't want to manipulate the images but have =20
>>>> pdftex downsample them.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Look up \pdfimageresolution in the pdftex manual.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I tried to use '\pdfimageresolution 30' in the preamble but size =20
>> of document did not change. Do I have to apply it to every image? =20
>> Also from pdftex manual:
>>
>> \pdfimageresolution (integer)
>> The integer \pdfimageresolution parameter (unit: dots per inch, =20
>> dpi) is a last resort value, used only for bitmap (jpeg,
>> png) images, but not for pdfs. The priorities are as follows: =20
>> Often one image dimension (width or height) is stated
>> explicitely in the TEX file. Then the image is properly scaled so =20
>> that the aspect ratio is kept. If both image dimensions are
>> given, the image will be stretched accordingly, whereby the aspect =20=
>> ratio might get distorted. Only if no image dimension
>> is given in the TEX file, the image size will be calculated from =20
>> its width and height in pixels, using the x and y resolution
>> values normally contained in the image file. If one of these =20
>> resolution values is missing or weird (either < 0 or > 65535),
>> the \pdfimageresolution value will be used for both x and y =20
>> resolution, when calculating the image size. And if the
>> \pdfimageresolution is zero, finally a default resolution of 72 =20
>> dpi would be taken. The \pdfimageresolution is
>> read when pdfTEX creates an image via \pdfximage. The given value =20
>> is clipped to the range 0..65535 [dpi].
>>
>> Doesn't this imply use of \pdfimageresolution just in the case if =20
>> a value for either width or height is missing? I am a novice so I =20
>> may be wrong, but for me it is not working. What is wrong? Thanks =20
>> for help.
>>
>
> Did you try
> \pdfimageresolution=3D300
> for 300dpi images (that's what the man page states)?
> However, the documentation sounds as if there would be no =20
> resampling at all, but the resolution parameter is only used to =20
> calculate the image size when there is no resolution specified in =20
> the image file (i.e., the number of pixels won't be reduced, but =20
> distributed over an appropriate area, to put it simple...).
> Thus it seems to me that the only way to accomplish the original =20
> task (ensuring that images in the finished pdf document are not =20
> beyond a maximum resolution (dpi)) is to use either Acrobat or a =20
> Quartz filter on the whole pdf document, as described in earlier =20
> postings.
No i tried 72 dpi and less because 72 dpi is default value (see =20
manual as above). Quartz filter worked for me, I just wanted to know =20
if \pdfimageresolution works.
Thanks for help.
Regards
Armin
------Mail Adress------
Armin Goralczyk
Wendenstr. 10
37073 G=F6ttingen
Germany
---------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] TeXshop and Springer manuscript submissions
From: "Peter Pagin"
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:54:56 +0200
Hve you tried putting the bbl file content into the main document
(replacing the \bibliography{} command)?
Best,
Peter
Jeff Roland wrote:
> I'm having trouble uploading a manuscript to Springer's online
> submission system as a LaTeX file. I use TeXshop, with BibTeX for
> references. Have any of you successfully submitted a LaTeX file to
> Springer's system? Any and all help would be appreciated.
>
> TIA,
>
> Jeff
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] Fourier as TrueType?
From: "Michel Bovani"
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:08:42 +0200
Le 10/08/2005 16:44, Bruno Voisin a dit :
> You might try to contact Michel Bovani, the author of the Fourier-GUT
> fonts. His email address may be found at distributions/macos/107-mac.html>, for example.
All the stuff is here
ftp://ftp.gutenberg.eu.org/pub/gut/distribs/fourier/fourier-mac-v15-12-02-2=
005.sit
>> Thanks in advance! (Someday I hope to anticipate these requests
>> rather than realizing what I need mere hours before a deadline....)
>
>
> Do you know this Calvin & Hobbes strip (that's Calvin & Hobbes playing
> in a sandbox and chatting, I don't remember the exact wording, I'll
> check at home):
>
> - Calvin: I can't work except when I'm in the correct mood for it.
> - Hobbes: What's this, then?
> - Calvin: Last-minute panic!
Here :
http://www.liacs.nl/~hoogeboo/calvin.gif
--
Michel Bovani
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] PDF resolution redux
From: "Morten H=F8gholm"
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:33:04 +0200
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:41:07 +0200, Armin Goralczyk =20
wrote:
I've snipped the previous four of five posts. There is no reason to do =20
that kind of full quoting.
> No i tried 72 dpi and less because 72 dpi is default value (see manual =
=20
> as above). Quartz filter worked for me, I just wanted to know if =20
> \pdfimageresolution works.
It doesn't work like that - my memory failed me obviously. Sorry about =20
that.
--=20
Morten
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] Fourier as TrueType?
From: "Bruno Voisin"
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:48:20 +0200
Le 11 ao=FBt 05 =E0 21:08, Michel Bovani a =E9crit :
> Le 10/08/2005 16:44, Bruno Voisin a dit :
>
>> you know this Calvin & Hobbes strip (that's Calvin & Hobbes =20
>> playing in a sandbox and chatting, I don't remember the exact =20
>> wording, I'll check at home):
>> - Calvin: I can't work except when I'm in the correct mood for it.
>> - Hobbes: What's this, then?
>> - Calvin: Last-minute panic!
>
> Here :
>
> http://www.liacs.nl/~hoogeboo/calvin.gif
Thanks! As it happens, I was just checking through the 10th =20
Anniversary Book, but hadn't found the strip yet.
In addition to having all the (English) books, I used to be a big fan =20=
of Calvin & Hobbes at Martijn's . There were so many goodies, it was as if Calvin =20
& Hobbes were still alive. Alas, the lawyers finally got the content =20
removed. I wasn't aware there were still strips floating around the net.
There's a good news though: by going back to what's left of the site, =20=
I learnt the Complete Collection is coming . Too bad the French price is so outrageous!
Bruno Voisin=
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] TeXshop and Springer manuscript submissions
From: "Jeff Roland"
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 16:05:52 -0500
Peter,
I have now. It still doesn't work. I keep thinking that somehow or
another I'm using the wrong coding or something, but I just don't
know enough about that stuff to have a very good idea what I should
try.
Best,
Jeff
>Hve you tried putting the bbl file content into the main document
>(replacing the \bibliography{} command)?
>
>Best,
>Peter
>
>Jeff Roland wrote:
>
>>I'm having trouble uploading a manuscript to Springer's online
>>submission system as a LaTeX file. I use TeXshop, with BibTeX for
>>references. Have any of you successfully submitted a LaTeX file to
>>Springer's system? Any and all help would be appreciated.
>>
>>TIA,
>>
>>Jeff
>
>
>
>--------------------- Info ---------------------
>Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
> & FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
>TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
>List Post:
--
Jeffrey Roland
Assistant Professor
Department of Philosophy
106 Coates Hall
Louisiana State University
Baton Rouge LA 70803 USA
Email: jroland@lsu.edu
Phone: (225) 578-7023
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] TeXshop and Springer manuscript submissions
From: "Chris Goedde"
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 16:24:07 -0500
Perhaps if you gave a bit more information about what errors or
problems you are encountering, some of us who have submitted TeX
documents to other online systems could offer suggestions.
Chris
On Aug 11, 2005, at 4:05 PM, Jeff Roland wrote:
> Peter,
>
> I have now. It still doesn't work. I keep thinking that somehow or
> another I'm using the wrong coding or something, but I just don't know
> enough about that stuff to have a very good idea what I should try.
>
> Best,
>
> Jeff
>
>> Hve you tried putting the bbl file content into the main document
>> (replacing the \bibliography{} command)?
>>
>> Best,
>> Peter
>>
>> Jeff Roland wrote:
>>
>>> I'm having trouble uploading a manuscript to Springer's online
>>> submission system as a LaTeX file. I use TeXshop, with BibTeX for
>>> references. Have any of you successfully submitted a LaTeX file to
>>> Springer's system? Any and all help would be appreciated.
>>>
>>> TIA,
>>>
>>> Jeff
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------- Info ---------------------
>> Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
>> & FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
>> TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
>> List Post:
>
>
> --
> Jeffrey Roland Assistant Professor
> Department of Philosophy
> 106 Coates Hall Louisiana State University
> Baton Rouge LA 70803 USA
>
> Email: jroland@lsu.edu
> Phone: (225) 578-7023
> --------------------- Info ---------------------
> Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
> & FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
> TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
> List Post:
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] TeXshop and Springer manuscript submissions
From: "Jeff Roland"
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 16:57:23 -0500
Problem solved. Apparently one must use the '.tex' extension to
satisfy the Springer system. This despite the file being a LaTeX
file.
Best,
Jeff
>Perhaps if you gave a bit more information about what errors or
>problems you are encountering, some of us who have submitted TeX
>documents to other online systems could offer suggestions.
>
>Chris
>
>On Aug 11, 2005, at 4:05 PM, Jeff Roland wrote:
>
>>Peter,
>>
>>I have now. It still doesn't work. I keep thinking that somehow
>>or another I'm using the wrong coding or something, but I just
>>don't know enough about that stuff to have a very good idea what I
>>should try.
>>
>>Best,
>>
>>Jeff
>>
>>>Hve you tried putting the bbl file content into the main document
>>>(replacing the \bibliography{} command)?
>>>
>>>Best,
>>>Peter
>>>
>>>Jeff Roland wrote:
>>>
>>>>I'm having trouble uploading a manuscript to Springer's online
>>>>submission system as a LaTeX file. I use TeXshop, with BibTeX
>>>>for references. Have any of you successfully submitted a LaTeX
>>>>file to Springer's system? Any and all help would be appreciated.
>>>>
>>>>TIA,
>>>>
>>>>Jeff
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>--------------------- Info ---------------------
>>>Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
>>> & FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
>>>TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
>>>List Post:
>>
>>
>>--
>> Jeffrey Roland
>> Assistant Professor
>> Department of Philosophy
>>106 Coates Hall
>>Louisiana State University
>>Baton Rouge LA 70803 USA
>>
>>Email: jroland@lsu.edu
>>Phone: (225) 578-7023
>>--------------------- Info ---------------------
>>Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
>> & FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
>>TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
>>List Post:
>>
>
>--------------------- Info ---------------------
>Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
> & FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
>TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
>List Post:
--
Jeffrey Roland
Assistant Professor
Department of Philosophy
106 Coates Hall
Louisiana State University
Baton Rouge LA 70803 USA
Email: jroland@lsu.edu
Phone: (225) 578-7023
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Version control of documents in TeXShop
From: "Andrew Kurtz"
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 17:02:44 -0500
While recently editing a document in TeXShop I thought it would be =
valuable
to have the current version saved before I make updates. That made me
wonder if TeXShop supports some sort of version control. I looked through =
the options, help, and archive of this list, but did not see any mention =
of
it.
Is there any support in TeXShop for document version control? Has this
topic been discussed before? I suppose I could use an external editor =
that
worked with CVS, but I like the TexShop editor. I've never tried setting =
up
an external editor to know how well it integrates with TeXShop.
Andy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] Version control of documents in TeXShop
From: "Stephan Hochhaus"
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 00:23:35 +0200
Am 12.08.2005, 00:02 Uhr, schrieb Andrew Kurtz :
> Is there any support in TeXShop for document version control?
I doubt that TeXShop has that functionality (otherwise Dick would have =20
bragged about it in the features list ;-)). The only "editor" I know of =20
that supports some kind of built-in version control system is CopyWrite, =
=20
which isn't designed for working for TeX files.
My advice would be to set up a repository on your system (preferably =20
subversion, not cvs) and have a working folder with your tex documents. =20
After each editing cycle all you need to do is fire up one line in =20
Terminal.app or use one of the GUI versions.
Personally, I would not benefit very much from TeXShop supporting CVS =20
because I am hooked on svn and I already have established my workflow. If=
=20
TeXShop were to get version control capabilities I'd vote for svn along =20
with cvs because it's growing more and more popular. But then again =20
there's the need for a repository unless you intend to create a new, =20
custom-made system especially for TeXShop (which would be proprietary and=
=20
therefore bad I guess).
Basically any kind of AppleScript could do the job as well, but then =20
again, I am not at all familiar with AppleScript (only Perl and PHP).
Stephan
ps: If there's any interest I could create an easy to understand tutorial=
=20
on how to set up a repository for version control using subverion and =20
getting the basic work done with it. Just to push it a little and drag =20
people away from CVS ;-)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] Version control of documents in TeXShop
From: "Bruno Voisin"
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 00:25:11 +0200
Le 12 ao=FBt 05 =E0 00:02, Andrew Kurtz a =E9crit :
> While recently editing a document in TeXShop I thought it would be =20
> valuable to have the current version saved before I make updates. =20
> That made me wonder if TeXShop supports some sort of version =20
> control. I looked through the options, help, and archive of this =20
> list, but did not see any mention of it.
>
> Is there any support in TeXShop for document version control? Has =20
> this topic been discussed before? I suppose I could use an =20
> external editor that worked with CVS, but I like the TexShop =20
> editor. I've never tried setting up an external editor to know how =20=
> well it integrates with TeXShop.
Have you had a look at iTeXMac? I seem to remember reading stuff =20
about CVS and iTeXMac, but I can't remember exactly what it was: =20
whether CVS support is included in iTeXMac, or whether its is planned =20=
for a future version, or whether the stuff was clues from iTeXMac =20
users about adding CVS support to iTeXMac, or whether it wasn't about =20=
iTeXMac after all.
Bruno Voisin=
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] Version control of documents in TeXShop
From: "Peter Dyballa"
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 00:26:36 +0200
Am 12.08.2005 um 00:02 schrieb Andrew Kurtz:
> Is there any support in TeXShop for document version control?
TeXShop can create a backup file ...
> Has this topic been discussed before?
Can't remember -- but I much too often trust in the concept of undoes.
--
Greetings
Pete
This is a signature virus. Add me to your signature and help me to
live!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] Version control of documents in TeXShop
From: "Bruno Voisin"
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 00:44:50 +0200
Le 12 ao=FBt 05 =E0 00:25, Bruno Voisin a =E9crit :
> Le 12 ao=FBt 05 =E0 00:02, Andrew Kurtz a =E9crit :
>
>> Is there any support in TeXShop for document version control? Has =20=
>> this topic been discussed before? I suppose I could use an =20
>> external editor that worked with CVS, but I like the TexShop =20
>> editor. I've never tried setting up an external editor to know =20
>> how well it integrates with TeXShop.
>
> Have you had a look at iTeXMac? I seem to remember reading stuff =20
> about CVS and iTeXMac, but I can't remember exactly what it was: =20
> whether CVS support is included in iTeXMac, or whether its is =20
> planned for a future version, or whether the stuff was clues from =20
> iTeXMac users about adding CVS support to iTeXMac, or whether it =20
> wasn't about iTeXMac after all.
I know this isn't exactly what you asked, but among the external =20
editors there are BBEdit and Alpha which include CVS support; Alpha, =20
in particular, has extended TeX functionalities.
That said, I still belong to the group of people who wonder why they =20
would ever want version control. Given I'm writing mostly single-=20
author documents, I consider that for the moment it would take more =20
time to learn how this works, install it and customize it to suit my =20
needs, than to do things manually as I've ever done.
All that to say, I know nothing about any version control system =20
(CVS, subversion, etc.) actually.
Bruno Voisin=
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] $MANPATH (again??)
From: "Aaron Jackson"
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:24:06 -0400
On Aug 11, 2005, at 11:16 AM, Gerben Wierda wrote:
>
>
> Greetings from Cura=E7ao,
>
> G
Please don't tell me you are on vacation to such a beautiful place and=20=
are thinking about LaTeX. That's too much dedication...
Aaron
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] Version control of documents in TeXShop
From: "Alain Schremmer"
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:49:46 -0400
Stephan Hochhaus wrote:
> Am 12.08.2005, 00:02 Uhr, schrieb Andrew Kurtz :
>
>> Is there any support in TeXShop for document version control?
>
> I doubt that TeXShop has that functionality (otherwise Dick would
> have bragged about it in the features list ;-)). The only "editor" I
> know of that supports some kind of built-in version control system is
> CopyWrite, which isn't designed for working for TeX files.
> My advice would be to set up a repository on your system (preferably
> subversion, not cvs) and have a working folder with your tex
> documents. After each editing cycle all you need to do is fire up one
> line in Terminal.app or use one of the GUI versions.
I am writing a book. What I do is just to "Command D" my working folder
"n" (it also includes an Intaglio folder and a pdf folder for the
figures, bibliography and whatever else), change the name of "n-copy" to
"n+1" and shove "n" into the folder "Previous". Takes about 30 seconds.
Has worked fine for me because it automatically also takes care of
version control for the figures, etc. Plus, whenever needed, I just copy
the folder onto my laptop and I have everything I need, figures and all,
to work elsewhere.
Regards
--schremmer
----------------------------------------------------------------------
End of MacOSX-TeX Digest
--------------------- Info ---------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
& FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Post: