From MacOSX-TeX@email.esm.psu.edu Sat Jun  4 19:55:56 2005
Received: from engremail.engr.psu.edu ([130.203.201.4]) by ENGRMAIL1.engr.psu.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
	 Sat, 4 Jun 2005 19:55:56 -0400
Received: from email.esm.psu.edu ([130.203.247.204]) by engremail.engr.psu.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
	 Sat, 4 Jun 2005 19:55:54 -0400
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 20:00:13 -0400
Message-ID: <60013.83362@email.esm.psu.edu>
Subject: MacOSX-TeX Digest #1393 - 06/04/05
From: "TeX on Mac OS X Mailing List" 
To: "TeX on Mac OS X Mailing List" 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: 
Precedence: List
List-Software: LetterRip Pro 4.05 (0531) by LetterRip Software, LLC.
List-Subscribe: 
List-Digest: 
List-Unsubscribe: 
X-LR-SENT-TO: mail.engr.psu.edu
Return-Path: MacOSX-TeX@email.esm.psu.edu
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Jun 2005 23:55:54.0473 (UTC) FILETIME=[F1D14D90:01C56960]

MacOSX-TeX Digest #1393 - Saturday, June 4, 2005

  Once More: TexShop wishlist
          by "Jon Hanson" 

  Re: [OS X TeX] Once More: TexShop wishlist
          by "Herbert Schulz" 

  Tiger Change All Open With
          by "Michael Gedalin" 

  TeXShop wishlist
          by "Michael Gedalin" 

  Re: [OS X TeX] TeXShop wishlist
          by "Bruno Voisin" 

  Re: [OS X TeX] TexShop graphics input
          by "Peter Dyballa" 

  Re: [OS X TeX] Once more: TeXShop wishlist
          by "Peter Dyballa" 

  Re: [OS X TeX] Re: Functionality for collaborative work in TeXShop?
          by "Peter Dyballa" 

  Re: [OS X TeX] Re: Functionality for collaborative work in TeXShop?
          by "Joseph C. Slater" 

  Re: [OS X TeX] Once more: TeXShop wishlist
          by "Simon Spiegel" 

  Re: [OS X TeX] Once more: TeXShop wishlist
          by "Herbert Schulz" 

  UTI for Textures documents
          by "Bruno Voisin" 

  Re: [OS X TeX] UTI for Textures documents
          by "Jon Guyer" 

  Re: [OS X TeX] UTI for Textures documents
          by "Herbert Schulz" 


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Once More: TexShop wishlist
From: "Jon Hanson" 
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:26:42 -0400

> One final note. Have you noticed that in Tiger selecting a word with
> a double click (other means don't seem to work for me - bug?) and
> typing Ctl-Cmd-D brings up an Oxford Dictionary definition? Very
> neat! I've moved my shortcut for the ``Find Previous Tab'' macro
> (used to find bullet ``tabs'' in my completion list) to Ctl-Cmd-G to
> stop interference with that nice feature.
>
> Good Luck,
>
> Herb Schulz


It's even cooler than that.  One merely needs to have the cursor  
hover over a word and hit Ctl-Cmd-d to get the dictionary.  No  
selection necessary!

Cheers,

Jon Hanson

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] Once More: TexShop wishlist
From: "Herbert Schulz" 
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 19:41:14 -0500


On Jun 3, 2005, at 7:26 PM, Jon Hanson wrote:

>
> It's even cooler than that.  One merely needs to have the cursor  
> hover over a word and hit Ctl-Cmd-d to get the dictionary.  No  
> selection necessary!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jon Hanson
>

Howdy,

Just tried it and it really works! So neat. Now if they'd fix up some  
of the bugs that cause some things to hang for way too long I'd start  
to get really happy.

Good Luck,

Herb Schulz
(herbs@wideopenwest.com)



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Tiger Change All Open With
From: "Michael Gedalin" 
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 10:16:59 +0300

> Subject: Tiger Change All Open With
> From: "Alan Curtis" 
> Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 09:56:08 -0400
>
> For some reason, my Tiger has associated .tex files with Script
> Editor. I can Get Info and change one file's open with to TexShop,
> but when I press the Change All button it reverts to Script Editor.
> Anyone know how to fix this?
>
> Alan
>
>

I had similar problems with associating all .tex files with  
StuffitExpander. Removal of SE and cleaning caches worked. I put SE  
back and everything is ok. May be deep cache cleaning would suffice  
for you. I used AppleJack.

******************************************
* Michael Gedalin
* Department of Physics
* Ben-Gurion University
* 84105 Beer-Sheva, Israel
* tel: 972-8-6461645
* fax: 972-8-6472904
* email: gedalin@bgumail.bgu.ac.il
* http://physics.bgu.ac.il/~gedalin
*******************************************




----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: TeXShop wishlist
From: "Michael Gedalin" 
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 10:19:11 +0300

One feature I would be happy to have to is "Typeset Selection". I  
used to use it in Alpha (typesetting selected text with the preamble  
of the whole document). It is extremely useful when one is making  
local changes in a long document and wants to check whether the  
changes are typed in correctly (equations in my case).
******************************************
* Michael Gedalin
* Department of Physics
* Ben-Gurion University
* 84105 Beer-Sheva, Israel
* tel: 972-8-6461645
* fax: 972-8-6472904
* email: gedalin@bgumail.bgu.ac.il
* http://physics.bgu.ac.il/~gedalin
*******************************************



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] TeXShop wishlist
From: "Bruno Voisin" 
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 12:33:35 +0200

A minor issue: in the preview window, when the cursor is positioned  
in either the Scale field or the Page field (in the toolbar), the  
keyboard navigation (i.e. the arrows and Cmd-arrows) aren't effective  
and you need to click on the content of the window (outside the  
toolbar) first.

Bruno Voisin

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] TexShop graphics input
From: "Peter Dyballa" 
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 12:22:53 +0200


Am 03.06.2005 um 15:31 schrieb Charles Pugh:

> Well, I was sure there was a silly reason for the problem.   I was 
> running pdftex on the file, not pdflatex.
>

No, you weren't! Since your file starts as follows below

>
>> On Jun 2, 2005, at 8:00 PM, Charles Pugh wrote:
>>
>>> \documentclass{article}
>>>

and (plain) TeX would have complained. I think TeXShop 'understands' 
part of a TeX file's header and chooses the right *tex command.

In TeXShop preferences you have in the right most department, 
Typesetting, the choice to set it to LaTeX or another engine -- but I 
think it would change TeXShop's behaviour, not parsing the native TeX 
header of a TeX file ...

--
Greetings

   Pete

"No man was ever taken to hell by a woman unless he already had a
  ticket in his pocket, or at least had been fooling around with
  timetables."  -- Archie Goodwin


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] Once more: TeXShop wishlist
From: "Peter Dyballa" 
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 12:54:26 +0200


Am 03.06.2005 um 15:53 schrieb Herbert Schulz:

> Have you noticed that in Tiger selecting a word with a double click 
> and typing Ctl-Cmd-D brings up an Oxford Dictionary definition?

Yes, that's a nice feature in Mac OS X 10.4 and works from other 
applications too -- I wonder whether they have the same also for 
German!

--
Greetings

   Pete

"A mathematician is a machine that turns coffee into theorems."


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] Re: Functionality for collaborative work in TeXShop?
From: "Peter Dyballa" 
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 13:33:27 +0200


Am 03.06.2005 um 18:17 schrieb Joseph C. Slater:

> The problem is that I have multiple groups and don't have them=20
> isolated. Everybody had to have access to the main directory with rw=20=

> privs (maybe x, I don't recall).

Could be this is a good way to set up:

=95 create a group cvs(_all) that has all CVS users
=95 the CVS root directory is owned by cvs(_all):cvs
=95 for every CVS project you create a new cvs_group, users can be in=20
more than one group
=95 every project's root directory is located in the CVS root directory=20=

but owned by specific cvs_group:cvs
=95 make every CVS data directory be 3775 (drwxrwsr-t  101 Admin  admin =20=

3434  2 Jun 15:47 /Users/Shared/Dokumentation) and every=20
non-administrative file 664

Besides you can give the cvs user account, i.e. the owner of all CVS=20
stuff, an environment variable variable CVSUMASK that sets permissions=20=

for newly created directories or files.


Have you checked http://s.sudre.free.fr/Software/CVSSUA.html?

--
Greetings

   Pete

"engineer: a mechanism for converting caffeine into designs"


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] Re: Functionality for collaborative work in TeXShop?
From: "Joseph C. Slater" 
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 08:32:38 -0400


On Jun 4, 2005, at 7:33 AM, Peter Dyballa wrote:

>
> Am 03.06.2005 um 18:17 schrieb Joseph C. Slater:
>
>
>> The problem is that I have multiple groups and don't have them =20
>> isolated. Everybody had to have access to the main directory with =20
>> rw privs (maybe x, I don't recall).
>>
>
> Could be this is a good way to set up:
>
> =95 create a group cvs(_all) that has all CVS users
> =95 the CVS root directory is owned by cvs(_all):cvs
> =95 for every CVS project you create a new cvs_group, users can be in =20=

> more than one group
> =95 every project's root directory is located in the CVS root =20
> directory but owned by specific cvs_group:cvs
> =95 make every CVS data directory be 3775 (drwxrwsr-t  101 Admin  =20
> admin  3434  2 Jun 15:47 /Users/Shared/Dokumentation) and every non-=20=

> administrative file 664
>
> Besides you can give the cvs user account, i.e. the owner of all =20
> CVS stuff, an environment variable variable CVSUMASK that sets =20
> permissions for newly created directories or files.
>
>
> Have you checked http://s.sudre.free.fr/Software/CVSSUA.html?


Thanks, and thanks!
Joe



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] Once more: TeXShop wishlist
From: "Simon Spiegel" 
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 17:01:40 +0200

Some additional feature requests (I think I emailed them a while =20
ago), but still:

- Is there a reason why TexShop Preview displays search results =20
differently than Preview does (or am I doing something wrong here?). =20
Preview shows the text which surrounds the phrase you search for, but =20=

TeXShop displays the section it is in. This is not very useful if =20
your search term appears several times in one section.

- And how about implementing =E2=8C=98F shortcut which automatically =
jumps =20
to search field? Currently =E2=8C=98F brings up the TeXShop editor =
search =20
field which is useless when you look at the PDF, searching with it =20
does nothing. So it would be nice if =E2=8C=98F was contextual.

- And of course, I'd love .Mac support. Share your settings, =20
shortcuts, scripts etc. among several computers.

Thanks for your great work.

simon

--
Simon Spiegel
Mutschellenstr. 97
8038 Z=C3=BCrich

Telephon: ++41 43 535 81 71
Mobophon: ++41 76 459 60 39

http://www.simifilm.ch

"I have never been certain that the moral of the Icarus myth is, as =20
is generally accepted, 'don't fly too high', or whether it might also =20=

be thought of as: 'forget about the wax and feathers, and do a better =20=

job on the wings." Stanley Kubrick


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] Once more: TeXShop wishlist
From: "Herbert Schulz" 
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 10:31:18 -0500


On Jun 4, 2005, at 10:01 AM, Simon Spiegel wrote:

>
> - And of course, I'd love .Mac support. Share your settings,  
> shortcuts, scripts etc. among several computers.
>
> Thanks for your great work.
>
> simon
>
>

Howdy,

Hmm.. Why not just .zip up your ~/LibraryTeXShop/ directory, put it  
up on your .MAC account and then you can download it from anywhere.  
Not automatic but it should work fine.

Good Luck,

Herb Schulz
(herbs@wideopenwest.com)



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: UTI for Textures documents
From: "Bruno Voisin" 
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 20:29:12 +0200

In Tiger, Textures documents whose name does not contain the  
extension .tex are no longer recognized as belonging to Textures;  
instead, they are considered as TexEdit documents. I've just been  
faced with this when trying to open an old Textures document. I can  
of course add the extension .tex to its name, but only if there's no  
other solution.

So far, a Textures document was recognized as such based on its  
Creator/Type strings, namely *TEX/TEXT. Apparently, in Tiger this is  
no longer true. I imagine this is due to the new UTI mechanism in Tiger.

The Blue Sky TeX Systems site has been updated following the release  
of Tiger, and two problems are mentioned: one, at , regarding interaction with  
SpotLight, and the other, at , which is precisely the above problem. It is said there is  
no solution at present.

Hence this mail: does any programmer here know of some command-line  
instruction for example, that could be used to tell Tiger that files  
with a *TEX Creator string do belong to Textures? Or can this be  
achieved by editing some .plist file somewhere (regarding Launch  
Services maybe?), to give files with this resource the appropriate  
UTI? Or does it necessarily require a change in the Textures  
application itself, such that this application declares the  
appropriate UTIs?

I tried a very naive thing: rebuild the Classic Desktop. But of  
course that didn't solve the problem.

Bruno Voisin

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] UTI for Textures documents
From: "Jon Guyer" 
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 17:20:51 -0400


On Jun 4, 2005, at 2:29 PM, Bruno Voisin wrote:

> Hence this mail: does any programmer here know of some command-line 
> instruction for example, that could be used to tell Tiger that files 
> with a *TEX Creator string do belong to Textures?

Just yesterday, an Apple engineer posted the following to the 
carbon-development list:

> From: Christopher Linn 
> Date: June 3, 2005 7:54:11 PM EDT
> To: Rainer Brockerhoff , Carbon Dev 
> 
> Cc: Subject: Re: Algorithm for "preferred application" changed in 
> Tiger?
>
> The creator code does not come in to play when determining a file's 
> content type (UTI). The creator code is just a record of what app 
> originally wrote the file, not an indicator of the file's content 
> type.


I find this so-called "design" inexplicable, but the answer to your 
question appears to be "no".

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] UTI for Textures documents
From: "Herbert Schulz" 
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 16:32:37 -0500


On Jun 4, 2005, at 1:29 PM, Bruno Voisin wrote:

>
> Hence this mail: does any programmer here know of some command-line  
> instruction for example, that could be used to tell Tiger that  
> files with a *TEX Creator string do belong to Textures? Or can this  
> be achieved by editing some .plist file somewhere (regarding Launch  
> Services maybe?), to give files with this resource the appropriate  
> UTI? Or does it necessarily require a change in the Textures  
> application itself, such that this application declares the  
> appropriate UTIs?
>
>

Howdy,

It appears that a Cmd-F search in Finder allows you to select all  
files with a given Creator code. You might try to gather together all  
the files with *TEX Creator and then change them en-mass to open with  
TeXtures. Just grabbing at straws here.

Good Luck,

Herb Schulz
(herbs@wideopenwest.com)



----------------------------------------------------------------------
End of MacOSX-TeX Digest

--------------------- Info ---------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
           & FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Post: