From MacOSX-TeX@email.esm.psu.edu Thu Oct 31 20:56:31 2002
Received: from engrmail2.engr.psu.edu ([130.203.201.8]) by engrmail1.engr.psu.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329);
	 Thu, 31 Oct 2002 20:00:17 -0500
Received: from email.esm.psu.edu ([130.203.247.204]) by engrmail2.engr.psu.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329);
	 Thu, 31 Oct 2002 20:00:16 -0500
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 20:00:01 -0500
Subject: MacOSX-TeX Digest #471 - 10/31/02
From: "TeX on Mac OS X Mailing List" 
To: "TeX on Mac OS X Mailing List" 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: 
Precedence: Bulk
List-Software: LetterRip Pro 3.0.7 by Fog City Software, Inc.
List-Subscribe: 
List-Digest: 
List-Unsubscribe: 
Return-Path: MacOSX-TeX@email.esm.psu.edu
Message-ID: 
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Nov 2002 01:00:16.0719 (UTC) FILETIME=[0AB405F0:01C28142]

MacOSX-TeX Digest #471 - Thursday, October 31, 2002

  Re: [OS X TeX] Ghostscript 7 over 6 Ok?
          by "Tom Kiffe" 
  Re: [OS X TeX] Ghostscript 7 over 6 Ok?
          by "Gerben Wierda" 
  i-Installer Release Candiate 3a
          by "Gerben Wierda" 
  A few basic questions
          by "Rick Jarosh" 
  Re: [OS X TeX] A few basic questions
          by "Luis Sequeira" 
  Re: [OS X TeX] A few basic questions
          by "Michael Betsch" 
  Re: [OS X TeX] Ghostscript 7 over 6 Ok?
          by "Tom Kiffe" 
  Re: [OS X TeX] Ghostscript 7 over 6 Ok?
          by "Gerben Wierda" 
  off topic
          by "Joseph C. Slater" 
  Re: [OS X TeX] off topic
          by "Ettore Aldrovandi" 
  Re: [OS X TeX] off topic
          by "Luis Sequeira" 
  Re: [OS X TeX] off topic
          by "Joseph C. Slater" 
  Re: [OS X TeX] off topic
          by "Michael Murray" 


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] Ghostscript 7 over 6 Ok?
From: "Tom Kiffe" 
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 20:23:47 -0600

Ghostscript 7 supports many png devices, including png16 and png16m. To =
see
a list a supported devices type "gs -help" in a Terminal window. If png16
is not in the list of supported devices then ghostscript was built 
incorrectly and you should recompile ghostscript. Thumbpdf works fine here
with ghostscript 7.

Tom



Matthias Zenger wrote:

>I did exactly this, but now I can't use thumbpdf anymore. It uses
>a device png16 which is not available under Ghostscript 7. Is there
>anything I can do to get the thumbpdf functionality back? I also
>tried to uninstall GS 7, but the GS 7 package for the new i-Installer
>doesn't support uninstalling the package.
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] Ghostscript 7 over 6 Ok?
From: "Gerben Wierda" 
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 07:34:57 +0100

On Thursday, Oct 31, 2002, at 03:23 Europe/Amsterdam, Tom Kiffe wrote:

> Ghostscript 7 supports many png devices, including png16 and png16m. 
> To see
> a list a supported devices type "gs -help" in a Terminal window. If 
> png16
> is not in the list of supported devices then ghostscript was built
> incorrectly and you should recompile ghostscript. Thumbpdf works fine 
> here
> with ghostscript 7.

As the info of the package says, png support is not included with my 
new distributions. It will be, but it is one of the things that is on 
the TODO list.

G


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: i-Installer Release Candiate 3a
From: "Gerben Wierda" 
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 07:37:31 +0100

I've implemented several minor changes. The  most important is that 
I've completely removed http://www.ntg.nl/ from my setup. RC3a will 
therefore also reset your preferences to default settings.

http://www.ntg.nl/ (the reliable hosting server for the last year) has 
suddenly gone "missing". As it turns out, the NTG (Dutch TeX Society) 
has moved their server to a new host, without informing me or other 
people who could have informed me. So, I am (we are ;-) in need of more 
servers.

And of course, as Murphy's law dictates, they've implemented the 
changeover at exactly the same moment in time that I released 
i-Installer v2, turning that introduction into a bit of chaos. That 
some people were able and other not able to see the i-Packages and 
i-Directories was a matter of DNS-caching. If your DNS had old 
information, you were fine, if it had new, you were in trouble.

As always: i-Installer volume via http://www.rna.nl/ii.html and 
TeX-volume via http://www.rna.nl/tex.html

G


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: A few basic questions
From: "Rick Jarosh" 
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 04:57:03 -0500

I am using TexShop on OSX,I was wondering what the advantages and 
disadvantages of other Latex implementations for OSX are-would installing 
multiple Latex front ends cause any conflicts? If so what are they? What 
exactly is Latex2e? Do all or most iimplementations use this version? If =
not 
which ones do?Another question- I am trying to get left and right facing 
quotation marks-I have no problem typing them into the .tex file,however 
they don't show up in the pdf-there is just blank spcae.Any information 
would be appreciated.
           Rick

_________________________________________________________________
Surf the Web without missing calls!=A0Get MSN Broadband.  
http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] A few basic questions
From: "Luis Sequeira" 
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 10:13:16 +0000

>I am using TexShop on OSX,I was wondering what the advantages and 
>disadvantages of other Latex implementations for OSX are-would 
>installing multiple Latex front ends cause any conflicts? If so what 
>are they? What exactly is Latex2e? Do all or most iimplementations 
>use this version? If not which ones do?Another question- I am trying 
>to get left and right facing quotation marks-I have no problem 
>typing them into the .tex file,however they don't show up in the 
>pdf-there is just blank spcae.Any information would be appreciated.
>           Rick
>


I don't know about other implementations, but I have TeXShop and 
OzTeX and there is no problem. OzTeX has its own files, which are 
placed in folders inside its own OzTeX folder, so there is no reason 
why it should conflict. Also, one can call the teTeX programs (the 
same Unix back end that TeXShop uses) from OzTeX.
(for instance if I want a dvi file I can typeset it with OzTeX 
proper, but since OzTeX doesn't do pdf directly, there is a menu from 
which I can invoke the teTeX program pdflatex to do it). I mainly use 
TeXShop to convert eps files to pdf.

As to the quotation marks, are you sure you are typing the right =
characters?
That should be the back quote ` and the single quote ' (possibly doubled), =
as
in `My title' or ``My title''.

Luis


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] A few basic questions
From: "Michael Betsch" 
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:39:35 +0100 (CET)

TexShop is primarily a frontend that calls programs and support files from
a standard TeX installation. You can in fact use all these programs from
the command line without TexShop. There are other implementations of this
frontend concept, e.g. iTeXMac; there are also add-ons for text editors
that allow you to call the programs from your texteditor. (Such add-ons
exist - among others - for BBEdit and Emacs). As the programs and support
files actually used are always the same, there is no danger in using
different frontends in turn. But you should try to understand what these
frontends actually do (in Command-Line terms). Try to process some files
from the command line, for example.

LaTeX2e: All currently available TeX implementations use this LaTeX
version. Earlier LaTeX versions are obsolete since a very long time. Some
stuff for "latex2.09" is maintained so that people will still be able to
process very old source files.

Michael Betsch


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] Ghostscript 7 over 6 Ok?
From: "Tom Kiffe" 
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:02:09 -0600

At 7:34 AM +0100 10/31/02, Gerben Wierda wrote:
>On Thursday, Oct 31, 2002, at 03:23 Europe/Amsterdam, Tom Kiffe wrote:
>
>> Ghostscript 7 supports many png devices, including png16 and png16m. To =
see
>> a list a supported devices type "gs -help" in a Terminal window. If =
png16
>> is not in the list of supported devices then ghostscript was built
>> incorrectly and you should recompile ghostscript. Thumbpdf works fine =
here
>> with ghostscript 7.
>
>As the info of the package says, png support is not included with my new =
distributions. It will be, but it is one of the things that is on the TODO =
list.
>

What could possibly be the problem with activating png graphics in =
ghostscript?
To build ghostscript without x11 support all one must do is comment out =
the
x11 devices in ghostscript's Makefile. Png devices are automatically =
included.

Tom

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] Ghostscript 7 over 6 Ok?
From: "Gerben Wierda" 
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 19:52:41 +0100

On Thursday, Oct 31, 2002, at 18:02 Europe/Amsterdam, Tom Kiffe wrote:

> What could possibly be the problem with activating png graphics in 
> ghostscript?

No problem, it has to do with organizing th eavailaibility of png 
during ghostscript compile and since my setup on my developer system 
changed I did not come around to doing that yet.

G


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: off topic
From: "Joseph C. Slater" 
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 13:53:16 -0500

Does anyone know how to take one .tex document and make two separate 
pdfs from it (without acrobat, or printing...). I'm writing a proposal 
and submitting electronically and the references need to be separated 
to they can put it back together again.
Thanks,
Joe
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
(+1) 937-775-5085
http://www.cs.wright.edu/~jslater


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] off topic
From: "Ettore Aldrovandi" 
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 13:59:11 -0500 (EST)


>Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 13:53:16 -0500
>From: "Joseph C. Slater" 
>Subject: [OS X TeX] off topic
>To: macosx-TeX@email.esm.psu.edu (TeX List)
>MIME-version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v546)
>Does anyone know how to take one .tex document and make two separate 
>pdfs from it (without acrobat, or printing...). I'm writing a proposal 
>and submitting electronically and the references need to be separated 
>to they can put it back together again.
>Thanks,
>Joe
>\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
>(+1) 937-775-5085
>http://www.cs.wright.edu/~jslater

I'm in the same situation. The idea I've come up with is to wrap the .bbl 
file into a separate, say, references.tex and latex that separately. That 
takes care of the reference part. To print the main body of the proposal 
without the references I'm using oberdieck's pagesel package to exclude =
the 
reference part. Not what I want, since one has to edit the source to do =
it, 
but it works.

Hope this helps,
--
Ettore Aldrovandi
Department of Mathematics 	mailto:aldrovandi@math.fsu.edu
Florida State University 	http://www.math.fsu.edu/~ealdrov



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] off topic
From: "Luis Sequeira" 
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 19:13:44 +0000

>Does anyone know how to take one .tex document and make two separate 
>pdfs from it (without acrobat, or printing...). I'm writing a 
>proposal and submitting electronically and the references need to be 
>separated to they can put it back together again.
>Thanks,
>Joe


Why wouldn't "printing" directly to pdf do the trick?
You do not even have to have a printer available.
In the print dialog, you can select the pages you want to print and 
then click on "Save as PDF..." instead of "Print".

If you don't have any printer installed, you can still do it.
Just go to print center (it's in /Applications/Utilities),
  click Printers->Add Printer...,
select, say, IP Printing from the popup menu, enter any (formally) 
valid IP address and there you have a printer. Although the actual 
printer does not exist, the Save as PDF command in the print dialog 
works just fine.

Luis

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] off topic
From: "Joseph C. Slater" 
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 14:26:39 -0500

It's the iterative nature of the beast. I'm doing this over and over... 
it gets old. Long story. US Gov. bureaucracy.
On Thursday, October 31, 2002, at 02:13  PM, Luis Sequeira wrote:

>> Does anyone know how to take one .tex document and make two separate 
>> pdfs from it (without acrobat, or printing...). I'm writing a 
>> proposal and submitting electronically and the references need to be 
>> separated to they can put it back together again.
>> Thanks,
>> Joe
>
>
> Why wouldn't "printing" directly to pdf do the trick?
> You do not even have to have a printer available.
> In the print dialog, you can select the pages you want to print and 
> then click on "Save as PDF..." instead of "Print".
>
> If you don't have any printer installed, you can still do it.
> Just go to print center (it's in /Applications/Utilities),
>  click Printers->Add Printer...,
> select, say, IP Printing from the popup menu, enter any (formally) 
> valid IP address and there you have a printer. Although the actual 
> printer does not exist, the Save as PDF command in the print dialog 
> works just fine.
>
> Luis
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Mac TeX info, resources, and news can be found at:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------
> List archives can be found at:
> 
> Threaded list archives can be found at:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------
> See message headers for list info.
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
(+1) 937-775-5085
http://www.cs.wright.edu/~jslater


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] off topic
From: "Michael Murray" 
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 07:48:52 +1030

Hi Joe

With pdfpages you could have a file

proposal.tex

and two files first.tex and second.tex which say

------
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{pdfpages}

\begin{document}

\includepdf[pages=3D{1-n}]{proposal.pdf}

\end{document}
---------

---------
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{pdfpages}

\begin{document}

\includepdf[ pages=3D{n+1-m}]{proposal.pdf}

\end{document}
-----------


The only hassle is you have to know n and m to
make this work and if they change as you work
on the proposal that might be a pain.

Michael
-- 
_________________________________________________________
Assoc/Prof Michael Murray
School of Pure Mathematics         Fax: 61+ 8 8303 3696
University of Adelaide             Phone: 61+ 8 8303 4174
Australia  5005      Email: mmurray@maths.adelaide.edu.au
Home Page: http://www.maths.adelaide.edu.au/pure/mmurray
PGP public key:
http://www.maths.adelaide.edu.au/pure/mmurray/pgp.txt
University of Adelaide CRICOS # 00123M
________________________________________________________






----------------------------------------------------------------------
End of MacOSX-TeX Digest

-----------------------------------------------------
Mac TeX info, resources, and news can be found at:

-----------------------------------------------------
List archives can be found at:

Threaded list archives can be found at:

-----------------------------------------------------
See message headers for list info.
-----------------------------------------------------